It's not symptomatic of a "strong brain" that you can decode the text above.
Once you know HOW to read, and you "know" you're "supposed" to be "reading,"--that is, that you have to decode text--your brain goes into 'reading mode," supplies the missing bits and disambiguates, via context clues, what is anomalous...
"If MEN could get Pregnant the [Right to Choose] would be enshrined in EVERY Holy Book and guaranteed in the very Bill of Rights. Child Support would be AUTOMATIC (until Proven Wrong) Pre-School and After-School Programs would be 100% GUARANTEED. AND Every County would have Family Planning AND Abortions ON DEMAND. End of Story!!!" Or: If men could get pregnant, abortion would be a sacrament!
It is probably unrealistic in the EXTREME to imagine that a functioning oligarchy in full cry might permit the continued, unmodified, uninterfered operation of so fundamentally liberating a technology as the Intertubez has become, and still remains. We need only regard how television was co-opted, and its liberatory poitential was turned aside, to become--along with the rest of its flickering-screened scions--the most POTENT agent of propaganda promulgation ever invented.
I regard the present structure of the Intertubez as I regard the Constitution: It works pretty well as it stands, and fucking around with it pretty much invites the bullies in, so leave it the fuck alone.
Reconsidered: I don't know what get's you off, but I need a venue in which to place stuff which is funny--i.e., embarrassing, or painful, or hurtful to the political/cultural opposition, and/or otherwise testing the inner and outer boundaries of "taste." I go for "sardonic," and "ironic," and even "sarcastic."
As well as stuff that makes even an old, beat-up, wore-out, skeptical, agnostic, dilligaf, cynical stoner say "wow," or its cognates...
The images on this site have been harvested on the Internet. The proprietor of this site merely reproduces them, under Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law, the "fair use" convention. This site is maintained solely for the entertainment of such audiences as it may attract. I have not always done 'due diligence' in attributing the sources of these entertaining images; for this, and to those I have skimped in acknowledging, I apologize.